Kcsr Rules Book In Kannada Free 931
– Referral of cases to Karnataka State Vigilance Officers.
The revocation of the license could result in a major financial and reputational defeat if a meticulous investigation that found that some judges took part in the riots draws the attention of even senior management. But the worst thing is the violation of democracy. A judge who has de facto listened to part of the power structures – and this is perhaps the main problem of any authoritarian system – still does not have independence in decision-making.
And the last remark. In itself, the system of administrative-judicial power in India – and even more so in Karnataka – is a pure euphemism. Human rights in this country are enshrined in constitutions or poorly respected already in ancient times. If (even theoretically) there is a fuss about this, a wave of emigration of judges will flood the countries. That is, here we are also confronted de jure with a kind of “social lift”, but in practice, perhaps, with a sanctimonious quasi-democracy. And these are just some of the advantages of the system, which should not be forgotten.
Plus, the Karnataka administrative system also has its drawbacks. Yes, several advisory bodies could be created on this territory (although, apparently, they will have to be taken into account), but there are no mechanisms for protecting human rights there, unlike other countries where justice and legality have become basic principles of state activity. The justice system in India is also very weak socially. Until recently, there was a system of distribution of posts, which, despite the high level of bureaucracy, gave good chances for getting a career. But after she ceased to act, all these possibilities disappeared.
Therefore, if local authorities begin to abuse their powers, chaos will inevitably begin in the country. The “professors” who said India had a balanced justice system will also be right.